Posts tagged as:

personal brand

What do fledgling entrepreneurs need to know about creating authenticity? And what, if anything, does this have to do with cupcakes?

cupcakesI had a chance to try to boil it all down to a few key ideas when I taught two classes of an undergraduate Entrepreneurship course at NYU’s Stern School of Business. My colleague, networks and entrepreneurship scholar David Obstfeld, teaches a ‘hands-on plus case study’ course in Entrepreneurship where students create business teams, launch online Amazon stores, and donate their profits to a charity. Starting and running their own real businesses, even if only briefly over a term or two, gives these students a chance to put into practice some of the concepts they are learning in their BBA program in general and as fledgling entrepreneurs in particular.

Professor Obstfeld has me come and lecture (lead a conversation, really) about “Creating Authentic Presence“. The conversation is one part marketing, one part authenticity, and one part social media. What students expect we’ll be talking about is how to market their stores using social media. What they get is (I hope) an awareness of how they can create really compelling businesses by finding the connections between their stores, their teams and themselves.

There is so much that comes out in this conversation that it’s hard to limit it to just one ‘takeaway’. But, it seems that the general ‘aha’ for students is the idea that they can — and should– link

(1) what they sell with
(2) how they organize themselves as a team, and with
(3) who they are as individuals.

What should link these three elements is some kind of shared, consonant meaning. If the meaning of one piece is embedded in the meaning of the other two, and if all three are reasonably well aligned, the entrepreneurs’ business activities will be more fun, more meaningful, and more competitive.

Embedded meaning in a trio of Brands

We talk about the concepts of personal, product and organizational meaning using the language of brands and branding. Despite my bias against focusing on brand before identity, branding language helps build on what students already know from their marketing classes and from being educated consumers more generally. So, we tak about a store/product ‘brand’, an organizational/team ‘brand’ and a personal ‘brand’.

The students all start with a solid understanding of how to develop a business idea, by identifying and selling products to fulfill a customer need. That’s marketing 101, and entrepreneurship 101. They think that entrepreneurship is largely about crafting a compelling business idea and getting that up and running.

201002161042.jpgIt’s the other two pieces that seem to catch the students’ attention as something ‘new’.

First, students seem caught by the idea that who they are as a business team — as these particular 4 or 5 students, as entrepreneurs, as experts on the market niche, as fundraisers for a charity — would have anything to do with defining, significant qualities of the business that they create. Student entrepreneurs tend to underestimate how much the ways that they work together will show up (intentionally or unintentionally) in the way their storefront looks, in the products within their storefront, and in what’s communicated by their storefront to online potential customers.

And, students are often surprised when I argue that who they are as individualsthe characteristics that are distinctive, and significant, and meaningful about each one of *them* – has so much to do not only with the stuff they sell but also with the qualities of their student team as an organization.

What I try to help the student entrepreneurs wrap their minds around is the idea that product (store), organization (their team), and person (themselves as entrepreneurs) work best together when they are intentionally connected by some thread of shared meaning.

Finding meaning in cupcakes

For example, one team has created a cupcake baking supply store — everything a person needs to enjoy his or her cupcake fetish (except for the cupcake itself).

There should be reasons why their particular team chose to create a cupcake baking supply store as opposed to any other kind of potentially profitable storefront. These reasons should be linked with the reasons why each of them as an individual chose to be part of this team. These two sets of reasons should resonate with  what their store is actually selling. In this case, their store is not selling cupcake tins, or colored sugars; It is selling the d.i.y. pride, the sense of indulgence, and the sheer beauty that their cupcake baking customers are searching for.

It’s easy to see this connection graphically, using embedded circles, but harder to see this connection across the levels of their entrepreneurial activity.

Using Social Media to Create Presence

As it happens, the process for establishing their business’s presence online, using social media, actually invites students to start to look for the connections between themselves, their team as an organization, and their stores. Knowing your own distinctive qualities, your own core values, the meaning that you look for, all help you establish your business’s presence online.

Because they are time constrained, the entrepreneurs have to begin their online marketing efforts by piggy-backing on their personal social networks and their own online voices. These entrepreneurs become brandividuals. They discover that a little self-reflection and a little self-awareness help them communicate not what their business ‘is’, but rather what their business is really all ‘about’.

The student entrepreneurs should discover that creating a presence for their stores using social media is not about promoting their stores or finding customers. Instead, creating a presence for their stores is about clarifying and expressing what makes their stores distinctive, significant and meaningful.

Which, in my view, makes business easier, more fun, and more authentic.

Blue cupcakes by QuintanaRoo on Flickr

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

If you're interested in this issue, please subscribe to my RSS feed. Or, use the blue box (upper right) to get an emailed update. Join the conversation below...

{ 5 comments }

What can we learn from Senator Barbara Boxer and her interaction with Brigadier General Michael Walsh?

1. Defend your personal brand.
2. Ask to be treated in a way that reflects who you are, what you have accomplished, and what you stand for.
3. To do anything else is to allow your personal brand to degrade.

200906191332.jpgBoxer and Walsh are said to have “clashed” during a hearing on Tuesday about the New Orleans Flood Protection and the work of the Army Corps of Engineers.

As described by Patricia Murphy, a columnist at Politics Daily:

During a terse exchange, as Boxer pressed Walsh on why the levees in New Orleans are still not repaired nearly four years after Hurricane Katrina, she said to Walsh:

“Could you say ’senator’ instead of ‘ma’am? It’s just a thing. I worked so hard to get that title. I’d appreciate it.”

The general’s response? “Yes, Senator.”

Why should she care? Because titles help to maintain personal brands.

Both Senator Boxer and General Walsh have reputations that they have earned over their years of public service. Both also have titles, also known as honorifics. These titles indicate to everyone the place that each of them has earned within their specific ‘industries’. For example, Boxer is not only a senator but also the Chair of the U.S. Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works.

For the Senator and the General, their titles are part of their personal brands.

Both parties deserve to be called not only by the titles they have earned, but also by the titles they prefer. Beyond being simply polite and respectful, the use of the appropriate honorific has a purpose for personal branding. The honorifics are an important shorthand that allows all participants to keep in mind the status and reputations of the parties involved. And, where one person’s formal status is higher than another’s, using the honorifics helps to organize the rules of engagement.

Was Boxer “rude”?

Boxer asked for the appropriate honorific (title) to be used. The general complied. Boxer used his title to refer to him, he (ultimately) used her title to refer to her.

After looking at the video of the interaction itself and also of the entire meeting, it seemed like a reasonable request. Boxer was direct, straightforward, specific, and NOT bitchy.

So, why is it that when asked to evaluate Boxer’s request that her formal title be used, over 75% of respondents indicated that they thought Boxer’s request was “rude”?

To answer that question, let’s take our own quick poll:

Why did some people think Boxer’s request was rude?

(1) They think personal brand and reputation are not important.

(2) They think that earned status is not important.

(3) They think that a woman’s personal brand is less important than a man’s personal brand.

if you didn’t choose option 3, go read the nearly 2,000 comments on Patricia Murphy’s post.

200906191331.jpgMaintaining personal brands is harder for some groups of individuals than for others.

Any time individuals are in a subordinate social position, whether they are the junior partner to the senior partner, the salesperson to the buyer, the woman to the man, or the minority group member to the majority group member, their personal brands are more vulnerable.

One of the perquisites of power is the ability to define the situation, and one of the easiest ways to define a situation to one’s own advantage is to diminish, disrespect or disregard the personal brand or reputation of less powerful parties. Thus,

Defending your personal brand is more important for women than it is for men.

As contrasted with men’s personal brands:

  • Women’s personal brands are more likely to be intentionally disregarded.
  • Women’s personal brands are more likely to be unintentionally disregarded.

And, as General Walsh’s efforts demonstrate,

  • Women’s personal brands are more likely to be disrespected even by those who intend to respect women’s brands.

Personal brands, gender and race

Promoted by a conversation with Terrill Welch, a leadership coach and consultant, I’ve been doing some research on issues related to personal branding and women. (Despite my many reservations about personal branding as an implicitly politicized approach to finding personal voice and crafting personal reputation, I agree enough with the true intent of personal branding.)

I’ll write more about personal branding, gender and race in the next several weeks, so in the meantime keep your eyes open for situations where personal branding works differently for women than for men.

You’ll be surprised by what you see, and not always in a good way.

Take it from me, Ms. Professor Dr. Harquail.

{ 9 comments }

What’s your *personal* ROI as a Brandividual?

June 3, 2009

I’m not a wholehearted fan of personal branding. Some elements of applying a construct designed to sell products to the activity of selling oneself are a little questionable (as I argue in my Employee Branding research),  because personal branding can lead to an overly commercial understanding of the self.
Quite simply, personal branding can become [...]

Read the full article →