Posts tagged as:

organizations

girl taking medicine In a word, yes. You’d never know it from the conversation we’ve been having about our current financial crisis, but it’s true: Taking responsibility for your organization’s part in the financial crisis can actually be good for you.

We’ve seen a variety of explanations for what’s been happening, some finger-pointing over who’s to blame, and a few big picture recommendations for taking charge of federal monetary policy. What’s largely been missing is a discussion of how individual organizations have contributed to the crisis and w hat individual organizations can do to repair our national and international economy.

Organizations (and their spokespeople) are afraid of having this discussion, because they don’t want to be blamed. But if your organization is backing away from any analysis of your role in the financial crisis, your organization is not really protecting itself. It is hurting itself. That’s because taking responsibility is the one thing that you and your organization can do , right now, to improve your organization’s financial future. And if your organization works to improve its own financial future, it will help to revise and revive its industry and our economy.

What should your organization take responsibility for?

We all understand that the implosion of our national economy was never predetermined or inevitable. The causes are even more complex than the proposed remedies. Still, it’s clear that actors at every level were part of the problem.

Your organization should take responsibility for what was potentially within its control. This might include taking responsibility for inept oversight, over-expansion, too much debt, extending too much credit, inadequate performance evaluation and training, underestimating risk, failing to learn, pretending your were experts where you were novices, or simply managerial hubris. Nearly every organization did something to contribute to the problem, and every organization can do something to contribute to the solution(s).

guilty dog What does taking responsibility have to do with Authenticity?

An organization acts authentically when it uses ‘who we are’ to drive ‘what we do’, and aligns its actions with its self-understanding. Similarly, an organization acts authentically when it understands how its actions — and the impact of these actions on the organization’s situation– reflect who they are as an organization. An organization that takes responsibility for its actions is acting authentically, because it is taking charge of the link between ‘who we are’ and ‘what we’ve done’.

Acting authentically influences the organization’s external reputation and the organization members’ collective behavior in ways that contribute to financial success.

What does taking responsibility have to do with your organization’s financial future?

How’s this for an interesting research finding:

When compared to organizations that blame external actors and conditions for their negative business outcomes, organizations that take responsibility for their role in creating negative business outcomes have a higher stock price one year later
(Lee, Peterson, & Tiedens, 2004 ).

How does taking responsibility affect future share price?

The impact of a positive reputation. One link between publicly taking responsibility and an improved stock price is how taking responsibility influences an organization’s reputation . Researchers explain that when an organization blames its situation, the organization contradicts all of its earlier efforts to portray itself as in charge of its results. In contrast, an organization that takes responsibility for negative outcomes lives up to its claims of being in charge. By appearing to im didn't do it post it be in charge, just as it claims it is, the organization creates a reputation for itself that, even if it made some mistakes this time, it will take more effective actions the next time.

Bottom line: Whether or not the organization appears to be in charge has a more powerful effect on its reputation than whether the organization always has good results.

An organization that claims to have done nothing to cause a negative outcome can’t be expected to do anything to improve its future situation. In contrast, an organization that takes responsibility and acts as though it can and will influence its future will be expected to do better the next time. And that kind of organization is seen to be more valuable, hence the higher stock price.

The impact of a "take charge" attitude. A second link between taking responsibility and an improved stock price is the impact of responsibility on an organization’s attitude. Taking responsibility influences how the organization’s members collectively understand their role in the current crisis, their organization’s contribution to the current crisis and their organization’s opportunity to do better. Taking responsibility for its situation helps an organization take charge of its future.

When an organization takes responsibility, it shifts how it sees itself. It moves from being a bystander to being an influential participant. In contrast, an organization that doesn’t take responsibility ends up reinforcing its own passivity, leaving it at the mercy of other organizations. An organization that takes responsibility moves itself into the fray and positions itself to make a difference.

If it seems rather simplistic to argue that taking responsibility for contributing to the financial crisis will help organizations get out of the financial crisis, understand that taking responsibility is just the first step . It is a necessary step, though, because taking responsibility shifts the focus of a host of other organizational processes. In my next post, I’ll explain more about how taking responsibility reorients the organization towards assertive, positive action . Stay tuned.

Lee, F., Peterson, C., and Tiedens, L. Z. (2004) Mea Culpa: Predicting Stock Prices From Organizational Attributions, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin , Vol. 30, No. 12, 1636-1649.

If you're interested in this issue, please subscribe to my RSS feed. Or, use the blue box (upper right) to get an emailed update. Join the conversation below...

{ 3 comments }

Sarah book cover Almost anywhere we look at this election season there’s something to learn about authenticity.  This is especially true when we’re able to draw analogies between individuals and organizations. Watching the ways that individuals work to present themselves as authentic , we can learn tactics that organizations can use.

Sarah Palin has been very effective at "extending" her authenticity. She has expertly used her real authenticity — the authenticity we can verify , to create the perception that she is authentic anywhere /anyway she claims.  To extend her authenticity, Palin has simultaneously  (1) created a fake "reality" about who she is, and (2) mixed this fake reality with the truth , (3) to make an attractive big picture of who she will be as a leader. Palin has tapped into our "hunger for the real," and so can your organization.

Why we look for signs of Authenticity

People are hungry for authentic leaders and authentic organizations . We want leaders and organizations that have the expertise to solve difficult problems, that listen to us, and that we can trust. Assessing an organization’s authenticity or a candidate’s authenticity is one way to gauge how much we should trust them .

Where Palin is Authentic

SarahVogue1 Sarah Palin comes atcha with a lot of personality. She’s got an identifiable, positive life story . She demonstrates her ambition, her commitment, and her confidence with her every move. Even when you push aside the way that her candidacy taps into our hopes about transcending sexism, our vision of balancing work and family, and our vision of women holding our nation’s highest offices, Palin looks a lot "like" what we want in a leader.

In many different domains, Palin comes across as authentic. She’s an Alaskan who knows how to hunt and fish. Palin’s not only a working mom , Palin’s a hockey mom who’s chauffeured her kids from school to hockey practice. As a small business owner along with her husband, she wants lower business taxes. Palin has a gay friend, so she’s tolerant . She links her claims about who she is to the actions she has taken.

Where Palin Needs to Convince Us She’s Authentic

palin kissenger

The challenge for Palin comes when she makes claims about the future – - claims about who she will be as a vice president. When Palin claims that her experience in one area demonstrates how she’ll act in the future in that same area , she seems authentic. It makes sense to expect that the kind of mom she is now demonstrates the kind of mom she’ll be in the future.

But what does Palin as a mom demonstrate about her policies about conflict in the Middle East?   

Palin (like many politicians) claims that she will be able to manage all kinds of new responsibility, based on what she has already done in unrelated areas. In many cases, the relationship between her actual experience and what she will need to be an expert in is more like a "bridge to nowhere."  The link between the cited experience and the promised behavior is imaginary.

An extreme example of an imaginary link is Palin’s claim that, because you can see Russia from some parts of Alaska, she’s got foreign policy experience. Most everyone sees through this claim. However, many of Palin’s claims look more real than they really are . They have the appearance of authenticity without actually being authentic.

So, what’s Palin doing to convince us that her foreign policy expertise is as authentic as her love for hunting & fishing?

Palin is using Real Authenticity to establish Fake Authenticity.

Fake Authenticity?  Fake authenticity , otherwise known as verisimilitude, is the appearance of authenticity without the substance of authenticity. It’s a condition that is similar to truth, but actually not truth. Fake authenticity is when it "looks like" claims and actions align when they actually don’t.

Establishing Fake Authenticity has two steps:

    Step 1: Create a fake "reality"

    Step 2: Mix this fake reality with the truth

Both steps, working together, help to extinguish doubts about authenticity while enhancing the perception of authenticity.

Organizations can mimic these tactics, to encourage stakeholders to think of them as authentic – and credible- in areas where they have expertise and areas where they don’t.

Want to know more specifics about using Real Authenticity to establish Fake Authenticity?

Check my next posts:  3 4 Ways Palin Creates a "Fake" Reality , and  Mixing Fake and Real, the Palin Way .

(See? I said there was a lot to learn about authenticity…..)

Photos: Vogue Magazine  &  Everett Bogue; Photos: Getty Images

{ 0 comments }