by cv harquail on February 2, 2010
If products reflect an organization’s values and an organization’s identity, does Apple’s new iPad tell us something about where Apple as a company is headed?
And, if that’s where Apple is going, do we all want to go there too?
Here’s a proposition:
- Apple as an organization is changing, from an organization that’s “about” creativity to an organization that’s “about” consumption.
- Most consumers haven’t noticed this change, although the tech community is on to it.
- While many consumers won’t care, Apple’s core customers and its biggest fans will feel disappointed by this identity change. Some may even feel betrayed.
Let’s build the argument:
An organization’s products communicate that organization’s identity.
An organization’s products – their physical features, their intended uses, their manufacturing processes, and their marketing strategies — communicate an organization’s values. 
When an organization creates, produces, distributes, and supports a product, that organization makes important choices. The organization places bets on what it thinks consumers want (or need), decides which possibilities it wants its products to support, and decides how it uniquely will make these come about. The organization chooses a physical design, a software platform, and a set of utilities, to support a certain kind of current use.
The organization’s choices also express, demonstrate and create the organization’s vision of the future.
Corporate values = product attributes = corporate brand = product brand
The relationship between an organization’s identity and its products’ defining attributes is like the relationship between the chicken and egg. Neither one comes first, and each depends on the other.
Consumers have an understanding of the organization’s brand (or identity) and see the brand in the organization’s products. And, consumers come to equate the qualities of the product and the attributes of the organization itself.
Nowhere is this interdependency between organizational ‘brand’ and product brand more apparent than at Apple.
Apple’s product brand: What do we think makes Apple products special?
Each Apple product is positioned as a tool to ‘think different’. Apple products emphasize sophisticated visual design, simplicity, sheer beauty, and an “alpha-underdog-ness” that suggests that everything that makes Apple products different from convention also makes them better.
Apple’s organizational brand: Who do we think Apple is? [click to continue…]
If you're interested in this issue, please subscribe to my RSS feed. Or, use the blue box (upper right) to get an emailed update. Join the conversation below...
by cv harquail on December 14, 2009
My friend Charles just took a new job ‘making rain’ for a creative services agency. The agency is well-known in its industry for producing top-quality product, but its business isn’t growing.
Why has their business stopped growing? Charles thinks that the problem with the agency is that it is “Too German”.
What does it mean to be “Too” German?
The agency delivers on all the attributes that you might think of from a firm that’s, well, German. Things are produced on time, within budget, with truly sophisticated design elements and dazzling production values. Clients love this about the agency.
But somehow, this isn’t enough to attract more clients.
I asked Charles to tell me what he thinks needs to be changed.
The way that Charles describes it, by the time a client gets to the point in the creative process where they use his firm’s services, everyone is really tired. The excitement of ‘ideation’, the thrill of creation, and the adrenaline of execution have all been enjoyed, and now clients (and the product) are down to the final mile, the finishing touches, the coming together before the release to the market.
And, Charles believes that these tired clients don’t want to come to a polished, minimal, high-design place (even though this is what produces the outstanding results). No, he says:
“Clients want to come home. They want to put their bags down. They want to do their laundry (figuratively speaking). They want to be comforted.”
“So, I’ll telling them they need to be less German, more American. Don’t you agree?”
I don’t think it really works to tell organizations that they are “too much” of whatever they are, and then ask them to change. Especially if you’re asking them to be somehow “less” of who they are.
Better, I think, to ask organizations what other attributes are part of their identity. Then, ask them how they might express these attributes in a new way to meet clients’ needs.
For example, what does it mean to “be welcoming” and “feel like home” in a German way? Is there a way to meet clients need to feel at home, and relaxed and confident that the work will get done, in a way that draws out the organization’s authentic German identity?
Think about it this way– both of the photos here illustrate German dining areas, where the physical environment reflects the social environment. The first photo is of the lunchroom at the Bauhaus. This room was explicitly designed to be kind of uncomfortable, to reduce the amount of time that students and teachers would spend there. Contrast this with the second photo, of a German restaurant, a much homier, relaxed place. There must be ways to make clients feel at home that are also “German”, no?
I’m betting that Charles’ new colleagues would rather think about who they already are and how they can be more themselves.
Organizations who need to change, to adapt, to grow, do better by drawing on and drawing out their identity. It’s a more authentic strategy for change.
Do you agree?
Bauhaus Dessau Kantine by 96dpi on Flickr