Posts tagged as:

employee branding

First it was the Siren.
Then it was the Christmas cards.
For a while, it’s been the original artwork by their very own baristas displayed on the walls..

And now, my favorite Starbucks is getting bouquets of flowers.

On a recent visit, there were two big vases of flowers on the counter by the espresso machine. (You can see in this photo what remains of the bouquets.)photo(16).jpg

Who would be bringing their Starbucks flowers? I asked the barista.

The first bouquet was from the UPS man. (He comes in five days a week and knows everyone’s name.) He had two bouquets left over on Valentine’s Day, so the UPS driver brought one bouquet to his mom and the other to his favorite Starbucks.

The second vase of roses was from a customer “who just likes us”, explained the barista.

What is it about this Starbucks that inspires customers to bring them flowers?

In a previous post, you suggested that I simply ask the folks who work at this Starbucks what makes it special. However, I was concerned about triggering “the Hawthorne effect”, where folks do a better job simply because they know they’re being observed. But I broke down and told the barista that I’d written a few posts about this Starbucks and was intrigued by the flowers.

The barista brought me over to the espresso bar to meet the District Manager, and I shared with him my thoughts about what was distinctive about this store. (He especially appreciated my pointing out how there was no dust on the espresso machines here, unlike at most Starbucks.)

After sticking my nose in their business for a little bit, I took my latte to a table in the back, near an outlet, and contemplated what might make this Starbucks special.

Data Gathering: Employee Interaction

The District Manager rejoined the Store Manager at the espresso bar and they resumed their conversation. Their conversation was joined off and on by the baristas, who chatted as they pulled shots and zapped pannini.photo(13).jpg

Watching this relaxed interaction, it occurred to me — maybe it’s the espresso bar itself that helps to create what’s special about this Starbucks?

Look at this photo here. Note that the DM and SM are sitting together, at the bar, facing the baristas’ work area. Notice how the espresso bar is located not in the front of the counter, but around the back and behind the espresso pickup area, across from the sinks, blenders and microwaves.

Even though the managers were having their own conversation, it was easy and natural for baristas to pop in and out of casual conversation with them. At one point, laughter over the baristas reading their horoscopes from a customer’s newspaper caused both me and the writer next to me to look up and smile.

More Data: Customer – Employee Interaction

An hour later the DM was gone and the bar was empty. A customer came in with his computer bag, looking to do some work. Since there were no free tables, he sat down at the espresso bar and pulled out his computer. When a new barista came out from the storeroom and walked behind the bar, the customer looked up from his writing and said hello. They started to chat about his scone and then the customer complimented the barista on her recent weight loss. (What?) Then, an off duty barista sat down with a beverage and chats with another customer. I was starting to see a pattern.

photo(14).jpg Front stage, Backstage, and in between

Up front at the cash register, the baristas are friendly but their priority is to get your order called and your change correct. At the espresso machine the barista looks you in the eye and hands you your drink, but s/he wants to get it to you promptly. Friendly interaction, to be sure, but not much relationship building.

But back here, at the espresso bar, there is no sense of a ‘transaction’ occurring. Instead, customers and baristas are mingling. People are connecting with each other and relating to each other.

The espresso bar area is neither backstage not frontstage in the store. It is a ‘liminal’ area, where boundaries are blurred.

The espresso bar is not “public space” like the cash register area, and it is not “private space” like the tables and chairs. It’s not a commercial or transactional place. Instead, at the bar the employee-customer interaction is informal, spontaneous, and interpersonal.

I haven’t seen anything like that at the other 3 Starbucks (whch have the same DM, by the way). There, they are friendly, but lacking in that extra je ne sais quoi.

I’ve noted before that it’s the people who make the place authentic. But, in places were all of the people are alike, maybe it is the place itself that triggers another level of authenticity? All of these Starbucks have friendly baristas. But perhaps there is something unique to this place that helps bring out the authentic in the people?

Could it be something as simple as the espresso bar? Do you think that this little, physical tweak that lets customers and employees interact in non-commercial ways is what makes it possible for the employees — and customers– to be more authentic, and to create something ’special’?

What’s your sense of this?

See also:
What’s going on at my favorite Starbucks?
Can a Starbucks touch your soul?
The People Make the Place Authentic

If you're interested in this issue, please subscribe to my RSS feed. Or, use the blue box (upper right) to get an emailed update. Join the conversation below...

{ 8 comments }

We need to go beyond dress codes and consider “Look Codes” for the work avatars that employees use online. Online look codes will help employees translate the qualities of their organization’s brand into the avatars they create for themselves.

Organizations should care about their members’ work avatars because these avatars are representing the organization, and its brand, in these online spaces.

Online Dress Codes

avat.jpg
When Gartner Consulting released a report proclaiming that Enterprises Must Get Control of Their Avatars, they made six recommendations. Most of the conversation around Gartner’s report focused on just one recommendation, that organizations consider creating online dress codes.

I think that most people focused on the idea of a dress code for work avatars not simply because the idea seems pretty funny. (A dress code for cartoons? Really?) But also, folks have focused on dress codes because dress codes are easy. We know how to do them.

Going Beyond Dress Codes

Online dress codes are easy to employ; simply transfer IRL corporate dress codes (or informal norms) into the online space.

Dress codes address clothing, hairstyles, and cosmetics, but they don’t address other elements of appearance, elements that are important parts of an online visual representation.

Online, what an avatar ‘looks like’ goes beyond how the avatar is dressed. In addition to clothing, avatars have demographic features (age, sex, racio-ethnicity, physical ability) and social features (aesthetics, gender performances). All of these features combine to create the visual image that the avatar presents. Organizational efforts to manage work avatars need to address all of these features.

A corporate “Look Code”

A ‘look code’ is a set of corporate guidelines for the overall physical appearance of employees. Look codes have evolved from retailing, where it has long been the practice for employees who interact with customers to present the organization’s desired image through their appearance. Look codes are all about employee branding.

Essentially, a look code falls somewhere between wearing the brand (with a dress code) and living the brand (with complete visual and behavioral guidelines). Look codes include not only guidelines for what they employee should wear, but also include ‘how’ the employee should look — e.g., “cool” or “hip” or “classic”. It’s in the “how” the employee should look that the qualities of the brand really come into play… since what’s cool, hip or classic is open for interpretation.

Look codes are understood as a marketing tool. They are also seen as a diversity-related minefield.

Taking away physical constraints …

Real people and their self-presentation is constrained by reality. What becomes kind of crazy an opportunity with an look code for avatars is that, online, there are no physical constraints.

  • The visual appearance of the avatar does not need to be realistic.
    The work avatar does not need to reflect the employee’s actual appearance.
  • The visual appearance of the avatar does not need to be human.
    The work avatar can be a non-human animal, a robot-y thing, a plant, a classic 1964 Porsche 911, or anything else really.

Historically, our at-work self-presentation has been constrained by reality. Now, online, our self-presentation is constrained only by our imagination. That’s why organizations might need to manage how members represent the organization, using something as broad as a ‘look code’.

What an online Look Code could look like

Organizations could come up with basic, real-world look codes and translate these into online guidelines. They could require employees to create avatars that reflect the employees’ human features (e.g., age, sex). Organizations could direct employees to project the organization’s brand through other conventional elements of the avatar’s human appearance.

Or, organizations could be a little more innovative.

Think about it: Without the constraints of reality and human-ness, how might individuals express the organization’s brand?

mimikko.jpg

  • Could we have every brandividual at Ford create him or herself as one of Ford’s cars? tachikoma.gif
  • Could we create a non-human species like Mimikko cat-people, or tachikoma, or even something that reflects the aesthetics of a particular (non-Japanese) nation? Could we personalize each version of this non human species?
  • Could we let people make up whatever animate creature they want?

Think about this, too:

What could we learn about our organization’s brand and how each individual might express the organization’s brand, if we let loose our imaginations?

Work avatar image from Amanda Linden at Second Life Blogs

See Also:
Crafting Business Avatars: An Authenticity Exercise
Representing your organization on Twitter: A Logo or a Face?
Why We Want Brandividuals on Social Media

{ 2 comments }

The People Make the Place Authentic

October 1, 2009

When you think about “the organization” or “your organization”, do you simultaneously overlook the actual people in it?
This tension between thinking of an organization as an entity and simultaneously recognizing that it is also a collection of individuals runs through all our conversations about organizations. When managers and leaders are considering their organization’s strategy, its [...]

Read the full article →

EmployER Branding vs. EmployEE Branding

June 24, 2009

Sometimes the distinctions between terms are irrelevant; they don’t make much of a difference. Not so with the distinction between employEE branding and EmployER branding. Just the switch of one letter, and the switch of the organization’s focus, makes all the difference.
EmployER Branding
EmployER branding is all about creating a sense of place. It is the [...]

Read the full article →

Don’t Let Personal Branding Stifle your Authentic Voice

June 9, 2009

There is a battle brewing between the concepts of Personal Brand and Authentic Voice.
If you’ve been paying attention at all (and I’m sure you have) you’ve seen the articles and the individuals touting personal branding. Everyone from Tom Peters to Seth Godin to Dan Scwabel is online telling you how to create your personal brand [...]

Read the full article →

When Employee Branding Hurts

June 8, 2009

Employee Branding, done well, can be a great tool for the organization. The organization gets employees to behave in ways that are aligned with the organization’s desired brand message, and employees get a sense of connection to the brand and what it stands for, as well as a little bit of empowerment for making [...]

Read the full article →

What’s your *personal* ROI as a Brandividual?

June 3, 2009

I’m not a wholehearted fan of personal branding. Some elements of applying a construct designed to sell products to the activity of selling oneself are a little questionable (as I argue in my Employee Branding research),  because personal branding can lead to an overly commercial understanding of the self.
Quite simply, personal branding can become [...]

Read the full article →

What’s a Brandividual?

May 20, 2009

When I read that David Armano had “invented” the term “Brandividual” a few months ago, I muttered choice words from an array of Continental languages and berated myself for not having TM’d the word myself.
Back when I started researching the practices of employee branding and ‘wearing the brand’, I’d toyed with the idea of using [...]

Read the full article →

On the importance of Flair

May 6, 2009

The origin of “flair”?
Every Organizational Behavior scholar’s favorite cult flick: Office Space.

Read the full article →

Wearing the Brand: Good idea, bad execution by Thai Highway Police

February 10, 2009

Employees are often asked to wear clothing and accessories that visually reflect how their organization wants others to see it. Anyone who’s seen a Southwest Airlines employee in shorts and a polo shirt, a New York Symphony Orchestra violinist in his tuxedo, or Jennifer Aniston sporting some "flair" has seen employee branding in action, [...]

Read the full article →