Posts tagged as:

economic crisis

It is disturbing to see that the effects of employers’ responses to the economic crisis are not being distributed equally throughout our population. While there’s a bit of controversy over who has it worse, it’s pretty clear that due to the structure of our economy, some groups are being laid off  proportionally more than other groups. For example, African-Americans and Latinos are experiencing a higher percentage of layoffs.

Women working for pay are also experiencing the expression of sexism as they are chosen first for layoffs, and lose their jobs becuase they are pregnant (and “probably won’t want to come back to work”), or because they are working “only” part time (and don’t really “need” the job).

And how are layoffs affecting men and women differently?

Gender and the Perceived Consequences of Layoffs

While a larger proportion of men than women are being laid off, it’s not as though women as a group are doing “better”. (See Melissa McEwan at Shakesville for a good discussion.) Because women work fewer hours, are more likely to have part time jobs without health insurance, and in full-time jobs earn 20% less than men in the same jobs, it’s hard for many working women to support a family. It’s a tough situation for working moms.

What’s more interesting than a comparison of the numbers is a comparison in how we understand the consequences of layoffs for men and women. The consequences of being laid off are different for women and men.

Gendered Definitions for Consequences of Layoffs

It’s claimed that men feel that their masculinity is threatened when they are laid off. Hanna Seligson, author of “Why the Sting of Layoffs Can Be Sharper for Men” in The New York Times, quotes one laid-off man:

“It’s hard not to imagine yourself as the breadwinner,” he said. “A lot of your ego eggs are in the job basket. I can’t shake the psychology that I’m supposed to provide.

There’s a good bit of pain about not being able to fulfill that traditional element of the male gender role.

This gender role pain is compounded for men in two-worker families. Where the man has lost his job and the woman has is now the primary only breadwinner, both of them need to renegotiate their gender roles. These emasculated laid-off dads also need to renegotiate their relationships with stressed out, resentful, inadequately-paid-but-still-employed moms.

For men alone and men with employed female partners, the consequences of layoffs are the same– Layoffs are knocking men and their women partners out of our comfortable (or preferable?) gender roles. See the article in the Boston Globe, Balancing Acts” by Maggie Jackson:

For families, layoffs shift responsibilities, roles. Women’s earnings more crucial with men out of work.

For better or worse, as they say, it’s new gender role territory.

Layoffs: Bad for men, but what about for moms ?

But look how the perception of consequences changes, when it comes to layoffs of (formerly) working mothers .

In the conversation about consequences for women who lose their jobs, the gender role issue is quite different. Instead of the pain of getting accustomed to some newfangled gender roles, women who are laid off have the opportunity to return to an old-fashioned, more comfortable, and by inference, better understanding of maternal femininity. For women, the gender role challenge is not the brave new world of egalitarian relationships but rather “get back home where you belong.”

Layoffs, for the (formerly) employed mother, bring some amount of — wait for it — relief . These now-unemployed moms get to stay home!

Please, do hold on to your hats. There’s more. [click to continue…]

Thanks for joining us. If these posts intrigue you, why not subscribe to AuthenticOrganizations and get posts by email? Add your email to the blue box on the upper right sidebar, and you're all set!

{ 14 comments }

Tools for Authentic Organizations: Dotmocracy

by cv harquail on March 23, 2009

3 Old WheelsIndhslf72 .jpeg The end of “business as usual”

Please, let us be coming to the end of “business as usual”. Conversations about whether MBA programs caused the financial crisis and what the future of capitalism should be suggest that ways of doing business that have long been seen as acceptable and even admirable are now being revealed as economically, socially and ecologically destructive. Hasn’t this economic crisis lead you to doubt whether “business as usual” is something we really want to recover? I, for one, don’t think that business as usual is worth saving.

Welcome “progressive organizational movements”

In spite of all the bad news, I’m becoming more optimistic that positive change may will occur, because I’m seeing all around us a range of (what I call) progressive organizational movements. Progressive organizational movements are initiatives that aim to create social and economic change simultaneously, through for-purpose business, through nonprofit initiatives and/or through political initiatives.

When I think about the macro-dynamics of organizations that are subtly and radically different working to improve our economic, social, political, and natural world, there really is change afoot. Yet, the organization scholar in me wonders about the relationship between the ends: social transformation, and the means: the organizational systems and tools that will create the organizations that will lead these changes.

Audre Lorde’s Change Leadership Advice

As Audre Lord memorably reminds anyone who ever takes a women’s studies class,

The master’s tools will never dismantle the master’s house.

The master’s tools won’t help us build authentic organizations, either. So now we need to ask:

  1. What tools will progressive organizations use to create the changes we need to see in our world?
  2. What tools can organizations use so that they simultaneously move towards their goals and act now on their principles?
  3. Where can progressive organizations find tools that express their values?

Venezuela dotmocracy.jpeg Progressive organizations, organizations with a change-oriented purpose, need to put their values into practice as they go about creating change. Otherwise, they will not act authentically and they will reduce their own power.

Every organization devoted to change needs to be built with new “tools” and I’m not just talking about Web 2.0 tools. I’m thinking about decision making tools, information sharing tools, coordination tools, feedback systems, tracking tools, and tools for celebration. Cellar to roof.

Finding alternative tools

Thus motivated, I’ve begun a quiet quest for new, alternative tools. When I say new , I don’t mean taking popular tools like GTD and scaling them up to the organizational level. When I say alternative , I’m not looking for tools that are built on conventional assumptions about relationships between people or conventional assumptions about what good “control and coordination” look like. What is Dotmocracy? | Dotmocracy_1237827403226.jpeg

I’m thinking alternative in that these tools start from a different premise about who we are and why we are together. I’m looking for tools that will support businesses and organizations that exist for something beyond profit, and that want to model right now the changes they seek. Still with me?

Dotmocracy, a little example of a big change

So, last week, when blogging friend Easton Ellsworth was looking for ideas about how to get tons of people involved in a cause, I sent him to this site: Dotmocracy.

Dotmocracy is a deceptively simple , easy way for a group of people to generate ideas and evaluate options. On the website is quick explaination of the process as well as manuals and forms for putting the process to work in your organization.

As described by Jason Diceman, an activist who has codified the advanced form of Dotmocracy: [click to continue…]

{ 1 comment }

Authentic Responses to Recession? Try Alternatives to Layoffs

November 10, 2008

The latest report of the Bureau of Labor Statistics states that in September 2008 alone, 2,269 companies executed a "mass layoff" . (A "mass layoff" is defined as firing at least 50 employees at one time from the organization.) This is the highest number of organizations executing a mass layoff since September of 2001.
While [...]

Read the full article →