From the category archives:

Research & Science

First it was the Siren.
Then it was the Christmas cards.
For a while, it’s been the original artwork by their very own baristas displayed on the walls..

And now, my favorite Starbucks is getting bouquets of flowers.

On a recent visit, there were two big vases of flowers on the counter by the espresso machine. (You can see in this photo what remains of the bouquets.)photo(16).jpg

Who would be bringing their Starbucks flowers? I asked the barista.

The first bouquet was from the UPS man. (He comes in five days a week and knows everyone’s name.) He had two bouquets left over on Valentine’s Day, so the UPS driver brought one bouquet to his mom and the other to his favorite Starbucks.

The second vase of roses was from a customer “who just likes us”, explained the barista.

What is it about this Starbucks that inspires customers to bring them flowers?

In a previous post, you suggested that I simply ask the folks who work at this Starbucks what makes it special. However, I was concerned about triggering “the Hawthorne effect”, where folks do a better job simply because they know they’re being observed. But I broke down and told the barista that I’d written a few posts about this Starbucks and was intrigued by the flowers.

The barista brought me over to the espresso bar to meet the District Manager, and I shared with him my thoughts about what was distinctive about this store. (He especially appreciated my pointing out how there was no dust on the espresso machines here, unlike at most Starbucks.)

After sticking my nose in their business for a little bit, I took my latte to a table in the back, near an outlet, and contemplated what might make this Starbucks special.

Data Gathering: Employee Interaction

The District Manager rejoined the Store Manager at the espresso bar and they resumed their conversation. Their conversation was joined off and on by the baristas, who chatted as they pulled shots and zapped pannini.photo(13).jpg

Watching this relaxed interaction, it occurred to me — maybe it’s the espresso bar itself that helps to create what’s special about this Starbucks?

Look at this photo here. Note that the DM and SM are sitting together, at the bar, facing the baristas’ work area. Notice how the espresso bar is located not in the front of the counter, but around the back and behind the espresso pickup area, across from the sinks, blenders and microwaves.

Even though the managers were having their own conversation, it was easy and natural for baristas to pop in and out of casual conversation with them. At one point, laughter over the baristas reading their horoscopes from a customer’s newspaper caused both me and the writer next to me to look up and smile.

More Data: Customer – Employee Interaction

An hour later the DM was gone and the bar was empty. A customer came in with his computer bag, looking to do some work. Since there were no free tables, he sat down at the espresso bar and pulled out his computer. When a new barista came out from the storeroom and walked behind the bar, the customer looked up from his writing and said hello. They started to chat about his scone and then the customer complimented the barista on her recent weight loss. (What?) Then, an off duty barista sat down with a beverage and chats with another customer. I was starting to see a pattern.

photo(14).jpg Front stage, Backstage, and in between

Up front at the cash register, the baristas are friendly but their priority is to get your order called and your change correct. At the espresso machine the barista looks you in the eye and hands you your drink, but s/he wants to get it to you promptly. Friendly interaction, to be sure, but not much relationship building.

But back here, at the espresso bar, there is no sense of a ‘transaction’ occurring. Instead, customers and baristas are mingling. People are connecting with each other and relating to each other.

The espresso bar area is neither backstage not frontstage in the store. It is a ‘liminal’ area, where boundaries are blurred.

The espresso bar is not “public space” like the cash register area, and it is not “private space” like the tables and chairs. It’s not a commercial or transactional place. Instead, at the bar the employee-customer interaction is informal, spontaneous, and interpersonal.

I haven’t seen anything like that at the other 3 Starbucks (whch have the same DM, by the way). There, they are friendly, but lacking in that extra je ne sais quoi.

I’ve noted before that it’s the people who make the place authentic. But, in places were all of the people are alike, maybe it is the place itself that triggers another level of authenticity? All of these Starbucks have friendly baristas. But perhaps there is something unique to this place that helps bring out the authentic in the people?

Could it be something as simple as the espresso bar? Do you think that this little, physical tweak that lets customers and employees interact in non-commercial ways is what makes it possible for the employees — and customers– to be more authentic, and to create something ’special’?

What’s your sense of this?

See also:
What’s going on at my favorite Starbucks?
Can a Starbucks touch your soul?
The People Make the Place Authentic

If you're interested in this issue, please subscribe to my RSS feed. Or, use the blue box (upper right) to get an emailed update. Join the conversation below...

{ 8 comments }

Useful research, if you are a gang member

by cv harquail on March 1, 2010

Oh how I love empirical research– the chance to answer burning questions, with real data, so that you can act more effectively.

Consider this new tidbit of info that I picked up over the weekend:

Full beer bottles break with less force than empty ones, so if you are going to hit someone in the head, an empty bottle is a better weapon.

201003010829.jpgFor details, check this article:

Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine
Volume 16, Issue 3, April 2009, Pages 138-142

Are full or empty beer bottles sturdier and does their fracture-threshold suffice to break the human skull?

Stephan A. Bolliger MD, Senior Forensic Pathologist, Steffen Ross MD, Radiologist, Lars Oesterhelweg MD, Forensic Pathologist, Michael J. Thali MD, Professor, Director, Forensic Pathologist and Beat P. Kneubuehl PhD, Physicist

Abstract

Beer bottles are often used in physical disputes. If the bottles break, they may give rise to sharp trauma. However, if the bottles remain intact, they may cause blunt injuries. In order to investigate whether full or empty standard half-litre beer bottles are sturdier and if the necessary breaking energy surpasses the minimum fracture-threshold of the human skull, we tested the fracture properties of such beer bottles in a drop-tower.

Full bottles broke at 30 J impact energy, empty bottles at 40 J. These breaking energies surpass the minimum fracture-threshold of the human neurocranium. Beer bottles may therefore fracture the human skull and therefore serve as dangerous instruments in a physical dispute.

I guess it is useful to have this documented so that, in a court of law, a beer bottle can be acknowledged as some kind of weapon?

It could also lead to strange, data-based suggestions for beverage regulation– e.g., only cans, no bottles, in schools in dangerous neighborhoods? Assuming that an empty soda bottle is as sturdy/dangerous as an empty beer bottle?

While I jest at the obvious conclusions one could draw from this research, if you take out the part about the skull-breaking, it’s also an interesting kind of question to pose to a budding scientist — why is a full bottle weaker? (Possible answ: pressure from fluid mechanics and additional mass due to beer itself add extra reactive force when dropped?)

beer bottles from Jackal1 on Flickr

{ 3 comments }

Authentic Twitter: Are exclamation points unprofessional?

January 20, 2010

Exclamation Points: An Authenticity Issue
Last week, I got a bit of crap from I was chided by one of my colleagues for sending a 4-line email with three (three!!) exclamation points. This colleague also pointed out that I occasionally sprinkle my tweets with exclamation points.
This is a problem. These exclamation points, s/he explained, are simply [...]

Read the full article →

Mockulation ®: Regulating Wall Street Using the Psychology of Public Mockery

December 31, 2009

What does it take to rein in the outrageous compensation of CEOs? The absurd bonuses of Investment Bankers? The “bail us out so we can award ourselves bonuses”-behavior characterizing Wall Street this year?
Do we need more transparency? More shareholder oversight? More whistle-blowing? More government regulation?
How about just a little bit more public mockery?

Reflecting on soon-to-be-published [...]

Read the full article →

How Job Crafting Can Get You Closer to Authentic Work

December 8, 2009

I was very excited to see an article in Time Magazine about one of my favorite ‘authenticity tools’: Job Crafting.
Job crafting is the practice of (re-)shaping the job that you are expected to do so that you can enlarge the parts that are important to you. Through job crafting, an employee can take on new [...]

Read the full article →

Why Does Social Media Interaction Lead Us To Protect an Organization’s Reputation?

December 2, 2009

I have been struggling to write a (scholarly) book chapter on Corporate Reputation, social media and authenticity. As I have been writing myself around and around the issue(s), there is one thing that I cannot get my finger on, and that is:
Why does having interacted with an organization through social media make us feel more [...]

Read the full article →

Bias Bingo: Blending Branding and Learning

November 4, 2009

I love it when basic business science can be applied to important causes. So, I was excited when my favorite FemaleScienceProfessor pointed me towards a clever website designed to teach about gender bias: The Gender Bias Learning Project.
The Gender Bias Learning Project is a great demonstration of how basic web skills, clever marketing skills, and [...]

Read the full article →

Evidence of a Mommy Track Bump: Returnees are seen as more motivated

October 21, 2009

This just in from the The Journal of ‘I’m Not Sure I Can Believe It’ … Well actually, from the The Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies:
Research published in the August 2009 issue suggests that coming back to full-time work after a few years on the Mommy Track can make you look “unusually” motivated and [...]

Read the full article →

Is the Mommy Track Bump Real?

October 21, 2009

Is the Mommy Track Bump real?
Perhaps the biggest reservation to have about the study that (I suggest) proposes a Mommy Track Bump has to do with the research method my colleagues used.
Because this research finding is from a lab experiment conducted among adult MBA students, it does not show that these differences exists in real, [...]

Read the full article →

5 Reasons why Management Professors should be reading blogs

July 16, 2009

Very few management professors read blogs about management, leadership, strategy or organizations.
I have no hard data, no scientific survey, to support this claim, but I know it’s true.
As I’ve talked with colleagues over the last two years about this blog, about other blogs that I learn from, about blogs as a communication medium, and about [...]

Read the full article →