From the category archives:

Politics

[Jan 21: In light of yesterday's Supreme Court Decision, I'm re-posting this serious & pop-culture critique of the anti-democratic argument that Corporations Are People. Scott Klinger writing over at Alternet, sets out what it would/should mean for corporations really to be treated as "persons" and thus have the same responsibilities as people too. Me, I'd like these corporate persons to be held to the same contribution limits as the next person-- so that I and Exxon would both be limited to $2,400 per candidate per election.]

If we were to list the top five or so Supreme (Court) mistakes of the last 200+ years, on that list would be the mistake in 1886 to treat a Justice’s unofficial remark about corporations’ hypothetical legal status as though it were part of the Court’s actual decision. This offhand suggestion that corporations could be considered ‘persons’ in the eyes of the law is a mistake that’s compounded over the years, to the point where it has fundamentally distorted democracy and capitalism as we “know” them.

The ThreatDown Generator.jpg

Okay, so now you know my feelings about the issue.

But did you know that Stephen Colbert feels the same way? [click to continue…]

If you're interested in this issue, please subscribe to my RSS feed. Or, use the blue box (upper right) to get an emailed update. Join the conversation below...

{ 2 comments }

Media Watchdog Eric Boehlert blasts out of the gate this morning with an incisive critique of a longstanding, problematic relationship between NPR and Fox News. Please go to Eric’s post “According to its ethics code, NPR still200912151112.jpg has a problem” at MediaMattersForAmerica to read the entire story, which he has been covering for several years. The elements of the story are complex and the implications of the story are quite damning.

A Problem of Brandividuals

In addition to many other important points Boehlert raises about news vs. politicized rhetoric, about the politics that deter NPR from right action, and more, the NPR vs. Fox “News” conflict demonstrates the downside of Brandividuals.

Brandividuals are employees who represent their personal reputations/brands as well as the organization’s reputation/brand to establish their expertise and credibility. As employees, brandividuals are effective because they draw on either their personal brand, their organization’s brand, or both, to establish their relationship with stakeholders.

InAuthentic Ethical Commitment by the Organization

At the meta-level is NPR’s ethical problem. Boehlert outlines how NPR, an organization with well-defined non-partisan identity and a clear ethics policy, allows two of its well-known journalists to appear regularly on Fox “news” programs as paid contributors. These two journalists, Mara Liasson and Juan Williams, are usually identified as NPR correspondents when they appear on Fox News.

Boehlert takes NPR to task for allowing this ongoing violation of its own ethics polices:

Public broadcasting guidelines clearly state that when appearing on outside programs “journalists should not express views they would not air in their role as an NPR journalist.” And, “They should not participate in shows electronic forums, or blogs that encourage punditry and speculation rather than fact-based analysis.”

The activity of these two brandividuals, Liasson and Williams, violates their main and original employer’s ethics policy. Yet, their employer is doing little to resolve this problem. This raises the question:

Is NPR really committed to being an ethical news organization? Is NPR being authentic?

Lack of Accountability & Responsibility by the Employees

Boehlert emphasizes the responsibility of NPR for the behavior of its own employees. Yet, in addition to the organization’s reluctance to act responsibly, we also see a lack of responsibility by the employees.

Consider this situation from the perspective of brandividualism and the ongoing challenge of balancing of the individual’s personal brand/reputation and the reputation of the organization that employs them: [click to continue…]

{ 5 comments }

The 10 Day Boycott: A S.M.A.R.T. response to Whole Foods’ CEO Mackey

August 27, 2009

Boycotts don’t work.
Boycotts rarely, if ever, achieve the goal(s) set out for them, in large part because boycott organizers lack clear goals for what response the boycott is supposed to trigger and especially for what the boycotting action has to demonstrate in order to be seen as “successful”.
So I’ve got a proposal, for those who [...]

Read the full article →

Reason #238 that we should have another woman on the Supreme Court

May 19, 2009

From Feministing. com
Really, Ann Friedman nails it. No sense in trying to recap this… just head to the full article. (captioned photo from Feministing)
Supreme Court: Pregnancy discrimination A-OK!
“Today our nation’s highest court ruled in AT&T v. Hulteen that women who took maternity leave and were discriminated against by AT&T are shit out of luck.
Before the [...]

Read the full article →

Working Moms Go Viral

May 7, 2009

… And I’m not talking about Swine Flu.
MomsRising.org is spreading a virus . .. it’s their "Mother of the Year Award" video, and I got one! Hooray for me! Mom of the year!
Does it matter that every other working mom is also receiving the "Mother of the Year Award" too? Heck [...]

Read the full article →

I can’t wait until 2057 to get a “man-sized” paycheck. Can you?

April 28, 2009

It’s possible that I won’t be around in 2057. If I am around, I probably won’t be lucid. And if I am lucid, I sure as hell hope that I’m not still working full time.
But if I want to get a “man-sized” paycheck and see the gender wage gap disappear for good, I might have [...]

Read the full article →

Socialism, Capitalism, 5 Points of Ignorance, and Progressive Organizational Movements

April 14, 2009

I just got done commenting on the blog of my colleague and blogging buddy Michael Roberto, a strategy professor at Bryant University. Michael blogged today about his concern that Americans (and by extension, students in the Business Schools where many of us teach) have lost faith in Capitalism.
Michael’s answer to this problem, in so [...]

Read the full article →

Flexible Downsizing and Sexism: Should we be worried?

March 10, 2009

There is a movement afoot to link organizations’ responses to the economic crisis to larger social goals, like sustainability and work family balance. Anytime we can get two valuable outcomes for one business decision, "that’s a good thing." Often, however, business decisions made for one reason have unintended repercussions.
Take the movement towards alternatives to layoffs, [...]

Read the full article →

Are Apologists for Layoffs Actually Just Bad Economists?

February 26, 2009

Here’s a post in honor of my friend Ian Ayres, a law & economics scholar who celebrates a big birthday today. Ian is constantly challenging academics of all stripes to stretch their thinking by asking themselves hypothetical questions. His favorite rhetorical tactic always seems to include two words: Why Not? Ian eschews any line [...]

Read the full article →