by cv harquail on February 2, 2010
If products reflect an organization’s values and an organization’s identity, does Apple’s new iPad tell us something about where Apple as a company is headed?
And, if that’s where Apple is going, do we all want to go there too?
Here’s a proposition:
- Apple as an organization is changing, from an organization that’s “about” creativity to an organization that’s “about” consumption.
- Most consumers haven’t noticed this change, although the tech community is on to it.
- While many consumers won’t care, Apple’s core customers and its biggest fans will feel disappointed by this identity change. Some may even feel betrayed.
Let’s build the argument:
An organization’s products communicate that organization’s identity.
An organization’s products – their physical features, their intended uses, their manufacturing processes, and their marketing strategies — communicate an organization’s values. 
When an organization creates, produces, distributes, and supports a product, that organization makes important choices. The organization places bets on what it thinks consumers want (or need), decides which possibilities it wants its products to support, and decides how it uniquely will make these come about. The organization chooses a physical design, a software platform, and a set of utilities, to support a certain kind of current use.
The organization’s choices also express, demonstrate and create the organization’s vision of the future.
Corporate values = product attributes = corporate brand = product brand
The relationship between an organization’s identity and its products’ defining attributes is like the relationship between the chicken and egg. Neither one comes first, and each depends on the other.
Consumers have an understanding of the organization’s brand (or identity) and see the brand in the organization’s products. And, consumers come to equate the qualities of the product and the attributes of the organization itself.
Nowhere is this interdependency between organizational ‘brand’ and product brand more apparent than at Apple.
Apple’s product brand: What do we think makes Apple products special?
Each Apple product is positioned as a tool to ‘think different’. Apple products emphasize sophisticated visual design, simplicity, sheer beauty, and an “alpha-underdog-ness” that suggests that everything that makes Apple products different from convention also makes them better.
Apple’s organizational brand: Who do we think Apple is? [click to continue…]
If you're interested in this issue, please subscribe to my RSS feed. Or, use the blue box (upper right) to get an emailed update. Join the conversation below...
by cv harquail on December 15, 2009
Media Watchdog Eric Boehlert blasts out of the gate this morning with an incisive critique of a longstanding, problematic relationship between NPR and Fox News. Please go to Eric’s post “According to its ethics code, NPR still
has a problem” at MediaMattersForAmerica to read the entire story, which he has been covering for several years. The elements of the story are complex and the implications of the story are quite damning.
A Problem of Brandividuals
In addition to many other important points Boehlert raises about news vs. politicized rhetoric, about the politics that deter NPR from right action, and more, the NPR vs. Fox “News” conflict demonstrates the downside of Brandividuals.
Brandividuals are employees who represent their personal reputations/brands as well as the organization’s reputation/brand to establish their expertise and credibility. As employees, brandividuals are effective because they draw on either their personal brand, their organization’s brand, or both, to establish their relationship with stakeholders.
InAuthentic Ethical Commitment by the Organization
At the meta-level is NPR’s ethical problem. Boehlert outlines how NPR, an organization with well-defined non-partisan identity and a clear ethics policy, allows two of its well-known journalists to appear regularly on Fox “news” programs as paid contributors. These two journalists, Mara Liasson and Juan Williams, are usually identified as NPR correspondents when they appear on Fox News.
Boehlert takes NPR to task for allowing this ongoing violation of its own ethics polices:
Public broadcasting guidelines clearly state that when appearing on outside programs “journalists should not express views they would not air in their role as an NPR journalist.” And, “They should not participate in shows electronic forums, or blogs that encourage punditry and speculation rather than fact-based analysis.”
The activity of these two brandividuals, Liasson and Williams, violates their main and original employer’s ethics policy. Yet, their employer is doing little to resolve this problem. This raises the question:
Is NPR really committed to being an ethical news organization? Is NPR being authentic?
Lack of Accountability & Responsibility by the Employees
Boehlert emphasizes the responsibility of NPR for the behavior of its own employees. Yet, in addition to the organization’s reluctance to act responsibly, we also see a lack of responsibility by the employees.
Consider this situation from the perspective of brandividualism and the ongoing challenge of balancing of the individual’s personal brand/reputation and the reputation of the organization that employs them: [click to continue…]