From the category archives:

Claims vs. Behaviors

If products reflect an organization’s values and an organization’s identity, does Apple’s new iPad tell us something about where Apple as a company is headed?

And, if that’s where Apple is going, do we all want to go there too?

Here’s a proposition:

  • Apple as an organization is changing, from an organization that’s “about” creativity to an organization that’s “about” consumption.
  • Most consumers haven’t noticed this change, although the tech community is on to it.
  • While many consumers won’t care, Apple’s core customers and its biggest fans will feel disappointed by this identity change. Some may even feel betrayed.

Let’s build the argument:

An organization’s products communicate that organization’s identity.

An organization’s products – their physical features, their intended uses, their manufacturing processes, and their marketing strategies — communicate an organization’s values. green apple.jpg

When an organization creates, produces, distributes, and supports a product, that organization makes important choices. The organization places bets on what it thinks consumers want (or need), decides which possibilities it wants its products to support, and decides how it uniquely will make these come about. The organization chooses a physical design, a software platform, and a set of utilities, to support a certain kind of current use.

The organization’s choices also express, demonstrate and create the organization’s vision of the future.

Corporate values = product attributes = corporate brand = product brand

The relationship between an organization’s identity and its products’ defining attributes is like the relationship between the chicken and egg. Neither one comes first, and each depends on the other.

Consumers have an understanding of the organization’s brand (or identity) and see the brand in the organization’s products. And, consumers come to equate the qualities of the product and the attributes of the organization itself.

Nowhere is this interdependency between organizational ‘brand’ and product brand more apparent than at Apple.

Apple’s product brand: What do we think makes Apple products special?

Each Apple product is positioned as a tool to ‘think different’. Apple products emphasize sophisticated visual design, simplicity, sheer beauty, and an “alpha-underdog-ness” that suggests that everything that makes Apple products different from convention also makes them better.

Apple’s organizational brand: Who do we think Apple is? [click to continue…]

If you're interested in this issue, please subscribe to my RSS feed. Or, use the blue box (upper right) to get an emailed update. Join the conversation below...

{ 3 comments }

Media Watchdog Eric Boehlert blasts out of the gate this morning with an incisive critique of a longstanding, problematic relationship between NPR and Fox News. Please go to Eric’s post “According to its ethics code, NPR still200912151112.jpg has a problem” at MediaMattersForAmerica to read the entire story, which he has been covering for several years. The elements of the story are complex and the implications of the story are quite damning.

A Problem of Brandividuals

In addition to many other important points Boehlert raises about news vs. politicized rhetoric, about the politics that deter NPR from right action, and more, the NPR vs. Fox “News” conflict demonstrates the downside of Brandividuals.

Brandividuals are employees who represent their personal reputations/brands as well as the organization’s reputation/brand to establish their expertise and credibility. As employees, brandividuals are effective because they draw on either their personal brand, their organization’s brand, or both, to establish their relationship with stakeholders.

InAuthentic Ethical Commitment by the Organization

At the meta-level is NPR’s ethical problem. Boehlert outlines how NPR, an organization with well-defined non-partisan identity and a clear ethics policy, allows two of its well-known journalists to appear regularly on Fox “news” programs as paid contributors. These two journalists, Mara Liasson and Juan Williams, are usually identified as NPR correspondents when they appear on Fox News.

Boehlert takes NPR to task for allowing this ongoing violation of its own ethics polices:

Public broadcasting guidelines clearly state that when appearing on outside programs “journalists should not express views they would not air in their role as an NPR journalist.” And, “They should not participate in shows electronic forums, or blogs that encourage punditry and speculation rather than fact-based analysis.”

The activity of these two brandividuals, Liasson and Williams, violates their main and original employer’s ethics policy. Yet, their employer is doing little to resolve this problem. This raises the question:

Is NPR really committed to being an ethical news organization? Is NPR being authentic?

Lack of Accountability & Responsibility by the Employees

Boehlert emphasizes the responsibility of NPR for the behavior of its own employees. Yet, in addition to the organization’s reluctance to act responsibly, we also see a lack of responsibility by the employees.

Consider this situation from the perspective of brandividualism and the ongoing challenge of balancing of the individual’s personal brand/reputation and the reputation of the organization that employs them: [click to continue…]

{ 5 comments }

Bias Bingo: Blending Branding and Learning

November 4, 2009

I love it when basic business science can be applied to important causes. So, I was excited when my favorite FemaleScienceProfessor pointed me towards a clever website designed to teach about gender bias: The Gender Bias Learning Project.
The Gender Bias Learning Project is a great demonstration of how basic web skills, clever marketing skills, and [...]

Read the full article →

7 Signs of Change at Comcast: What I’ve found so far

October 28, 2009

It looks like Comcast is, in fact, working to integrate its social media efforts into its internal systems. This integration of their customer contact efforts, along with internal leadership initiatives, is powering overall organizational change.
In my previous post, I questioned whether people were assuming cultural change at Comcast simply because their CEO claimed change was [...]

Read the full article →

Is Twitter is Really Changing Comcast’s Culture?: 7 Signs to Look For

October 26, 2009

If you read TechCruch or pay attention to social media gurus, you might think that Comcast was really making progress towards becoming more customer-oriented.
We hear a lot about Frank Eliason and his leadership in getting Comcast onto social media to respond to customer complaints that, increasingly, are being voiced online. With @ComcastCares on Twitter, Eliason [...]

Read the full article →

Can a Flu Shot demonstrate Authenticity?

October 15, 2009

Has your organization made it easy for you to get a flu vaccine?
If your organization really wanted to be authentic, maybe it would offer everyone flu shots.

At a private pre-school near me, they had a pediatrician offer a “flu shot clinic” for children, teachers, parents and caregivers– doing their best to get flu protection for [...]

Read the full article →

Jews and Social Media: Aligned values reinforce an Authentic strategy

September 21, 2009

Can your organization’s core values make it easier for you to extend yourselves onto social media effectively?
For some organizations, absolutely yes. Consider the opportunity for one Jewish organization as it considers its social media strategy.
Last week I had the chance to work with a group of non-profit Jewish professionals in charge of youth community outreach [...]

Read the full article →

Burned by Inauthenticity

September 14, 2009

I had almost forgotten the details of our family’s bad experience with a national espresso chain after my daughter was burned by a grande hot tea on her way to the Big Apple Circus. Then I saw this article about a toddler being burned by a hot hash brown at Dunkin Donuts, and my whole [...]

Read the full article →

The Two-Faced CEO: Citizen or Whole Foods Shareholder?

August 24, 2009

In today’s transparent and political economy, the two-faced CEO can’t catch a break. When he acts as a Citizen, he might damage his organization’s reputation. When he acts as a Shareholder, he  might limit his own participation in our political conversation.  Neither option is good.  What’s a CEO to do?
The broohaa over the anti-ObamaCare opinion [...]

Read the full article →

Who is advising the NY Jets Management?

August 19, 2009

Whoever it is, they are doing a good job!

I’m not talking about rosters, game strategies or coaching assignments– I’m talking about using a deep understanding of how to support your whole organization in moving towards a goal.
Last fall, I posted about the Jets’ new training facility, and how it was designed explicitly and implicitly to [...]

Read the full article →